Can Sudan Split Without Falling Apart? Essay

1. The feature that families like Achai Chols are leaving northern Sudan indicates that the people would rather be in southern Sudan fighting for southern independenceto stopthe close state of war and creating a better life for them and their families.2. The thesis of the article is that Sudan has been politically unstable over the period of its two long civil wars. The south did not identify with the Arab light-emitting diode Sudanese society and created a referendum on southern independence. The two halves of the nation fight in an imminent war killing millions while trying to resolve the issues.3. The size of Sudan is big compared to other African nations. Sudan is Africas biggest country.4. The two halves of the nation differ in culture, race and religion.5. In Sudans history, the United States brokered a Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) to end more than half a century of conflict, creating an free southern region and holding out the option of secession if the south so ch ose.6. The south chose to hit to the CPA to separate the south from the north.7. The words of Kiir Mayardit, This is the final part of our journey, are inherent compared to the direct quotes in the first two paragraphs because they are saying that south Sudan is their home, the place where they belong, and the place that they want to fight for.8. reciprocal reliance is when two sides are interdependent on each other. Where there is a relationship in which each member is mutually dependant on the other.9. The first sentence of paragraph six provided if Sudans history makes dividing the nation seem an obvious solution, drawing a line in the gritrock is not as easy as it sounds is saying that it is obvious that Sudan should be divided, but its not possible to just draw a line between the north and the south. It requires negotiating, which they are not will to compromise to.10. Parts of the north wanting to secede along with the south is most likely handout to stand in the way of a quietful solution to dividing the country, because the north does not approve of it.11. The pass method used to pursue a peaceful solution is to use Sudans oil as a force for peace.12. The United States and other countries are willing to make diplomacy to ensure peace in Sudan.13. Divorce could mean a crushing alimony is the analogy the author uses to illustrate that the form might be difficult. The author is describing the separation of the two sides as a divorce, and the expense that its freeing to cost the north as the alimony. The type of figurative language used in the analogy is a metaphor.14. The most glaring divide between northern and southern Sudan is the government structure.15. An agreement to share the triple-crownness of aid and oil exports will be required of all parties involved to reach a successful end.16. When reading the quote in the concluding paragraph, Damned if I know. There are an astonishing field of problems that are going to wash over this place, I visualize a man of high top executive saying it. The inclusion of the quote keeps the meaning of the article by saying that the two sides are tranquillize going to have many problems and war even after they are separated.17. The author uses the information in the last paragraph to describe how Sudan has problems and will still have problems and war. Failure in the form of war will be easy to spot. But the author also says Success will be little obvious slow down, messy and with endless setbacks, meaning that the problems are being resolved in a slow and unmannerly fashion.